Comments on: Question http://www.thiscowispurple.com/2008/01/27/question/ Just another WordPress weblog Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:43:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: YH http://www.thiscowispurple.com/2008/01/27/question/#comment-2696 YH Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:05:33 +0000 http://www.thiscowispurple.com/2008/01/27/question/#comment-2696 ha.. since nobody has come to conclusion, I'm sure its pretty complicated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus Is quite interesting cos it has a few angles. The things we assume as fact are actually so debatable. And the fact is 100% implied quite obviously through his genealogies in the bible but never explicitly said.. unless you count Luke 1:30-35 when Mary says she's a virgin. I notice the more people dig into the bible from the reason point of view the more complicated and lost they get. haha.. if they would study the spiritual aspects and take everything else by faith and reject the secular humanist thinking they would be fine. ha.. since nobody has come to conclusion, I’m sure its pretty complicated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus

Is quite interesting cos it has a few angles. The things we assume as fact are actually so debatable. And the fact is 100% implied quite obviously through his genealogies in the bible but never explicitly said.. unless you count Luke 1:30-35 when Mary says she’s a virgin.

I notice the more people dig into the bible from the reason point of view the more complicated and lost they get. haha.. if they would study the spiritual aspects and take everything else by faith and reject the secular humanist thinking they would be fine.

]]> By: ge http://www.thiscowispurple.com/2008/01/27/question/#comment-2695 ge Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:23:20 +0000 http://www.thiscowispurple.com/2008/01/27/question/#comment-2695 actually wrt the Is 7:14 verse, i'm pretty convinced that it did not actually refer to Christ.. :) i say that having heard the arguments to and for.. without going into a whole long story.. i hold more strongly to the authorial intent.. and i believe it's only because we have a complete canon that we can look back and claim reference to Christ but i'm pretty sure that Isaiah did not make direct reference to Christ in that passage.. actually wrt the Is 7:14 verse, i’m pretty convinced that it did not actually refer to Christ.. :) i say that having heard the arguments to and for..

without going into a whole long story.. i hold more strongly to the authorial intent.. and i believe it’s only because we have a complete canon that we can look back and claim reference to Christ but i’m pretty sure that Isaiah did not make direct reference to Christ in that passage..

]]>